I know, you might be thinking, "GrammarS?! Is she crazy?! Just saying that is breaking the rules of grammar!" However, in the article "The Grammar of Context: Breakfast, Bumper Stickers, and Beyond" by Cheryl Almeda and Jonathan Bush, the idea of multiple types of grammar is discussed in depth.
This is such an interesting idea to me, personally, because I'm what you may call a "stickler" about grammar. Some may consider this an annoying quality, but whatever. I'm proud of the skills regarding grammar that I've refined over the years, and I jump at any opportunity to improve my own skills or help someone else with theirs. (Although I've got to admit, sometimes it's hard to refrain from "helping" someone who just doesn't want help with grammar.) This article, "The Grammar of Context" introduces the idea of grammar as being contextual. Almeda and Bush write, "The context creates the grammar...there is no single correct grammar -- there are thousands of variations on grammar, each dependent upon the elements of context that affect it."
Some of the contexts which Almeda and Bush talk about are grocery lists, cereal boxes, formal papers, bumper stickers, Facebook posts, and text messages. It's funny because it seriously drives me nuts when I see bad grammar in any of these contexts, but I guess sometimes I need to take a step back. I need to ask myself, "For this context or situation, is the grammar really inappropriate? Or is it perfectly fine for the message it's trying to convey?"
Grammar as a Decision
I've got to say, I seriously love the way Almeda and Bush discuss grammar as a conscious decision. They say, "The grammar of a text message is different for that of a professional memo. Even within academic contexts, the grammar used in a biology class differs from that in history or English or math. In doing so, we are able to help them see grammar as a rhetorical act and enhance our students' abilities to consider language use as rich, complex, and full of decisions -- beyond that of simply trying to avoid error." It brings about the idea that some errors are not really errors. They're simply contextual decisions that we must make when writing.
#Grammar
One last thing I'd like to discuss is hashtags. They've pretty much become a staple in our modern culture, but for some reason, it still drives me up the wall when I see them in sentences in public, whether it's on billboards or flyers. So, is it appropriate? Is it grammatically correct? Once again, I come back to the idea of context. It's certainly not appropriate in a formal paper or really anything school-related. However, hashtags are certainly a decision, made by the writer or creator. It's the same sort of idea as using "I love u" or "Where r u?" in a text. Sure, it's not technically correct, but it's contextually appropriate. Hashtags are the same; they're correct for what they are.
It's important to remember, too, that language is constantly evolving. Using google as a verb wasn't "correct" twenty years ago. It wasn't even a word! Grammar evolves with language, as more and more people make a conscious decision to do something new with words and markings. Ten years ago, the hashtag had no meaning at all. Now, it's almost grammatically incorrect to not use it on Twitter!
ReplyDeleteThat's so true! Society uses a lot of words that aren't even in the dictionary, but are still contextually relevant and appropriate.
Delete